As Arbitrator

Selected cases

AAA/ICDR Rules
Role: Sole Arbitrator
Parties: American investor (Claimant) vs. British holding company (Respondent)
Issue: Multiple investments in various Latin American jurisdictions
Seat: Miami, USA
Language: English (documentation and contracts in Spanish)
Applicable Law: Florida law

AAA/ICDR Rules
Role: Emergency Arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian banking company (Claimant) vs. Hong Kong company (Respondent)
Issue: Contract for payment processing services
Seat: São Paulo, Brazil
Language: English (documentation partially in Portuguese)
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

AAA/ICDR Rules
Role: co-arbitrator
Parties: Colombian construction company with foreign ownership (Claimant) vs. National Infrastructure Agency of Colombia (Respondent)
Issue: Concession dispute, compensation for damages
Seat: Bogotá, Colombia
Language: Spanish
Applicable Law: Colombian Law

AAA/ICDR Rules
Role: co-arbitrator
Parties: Colombian construction company with foreign ownership (Claimant) vs. National Infrastructure Agency of Colombia (Respondent)
Issue: Concession dispute, compensation for damages
Seat: Bogotá, Colombia
Language: Spanish
Applicable Law: Colombian Law

ICC Rules
Role: Emergency Arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian subsidiary of a Canadian company (Claimant) vs. Brazilian energy company (Respondent)
Issue: Natural gas unitization dispute
Seat: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Language: Portuguese (documentation partially in English)
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

ICC Rules
Role: Co-arbitrator
Parties: American company (Claimant) vs. Municipality of Rio de Janeiro (Respondent)
Issue: PPP dispute on public lighting modernization
Seat: São Paulo, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAM-CCBC Rules
Role: Co-arbitrator
Parties: German supplier (Claimant) vs. Norwegian buyers (Respondents)
Issue: Wind power equipment supply dispute
Seat: São Paulo, Brazil
Language: English
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAM-CCBC Rules
Role: Co-arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian construction company (Claimant) vs. Brazilian airport operator (Respondent)
Issue: Concession dispute
Seat: São Paulo, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAM-CCBC Rules
Role: Sole Arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian seller (Claimant) vs. Jordanian buyer (Respondent)
Issue: International sale dispute under the CISG
Seat: São Paulo, Brazil
Language: English
Applicable Law: Brazilian law, including the CISG

CAMARB Rules
Role: Co-arbitrator
Parties: Two Brazilian companies
Issue: Construction dispute over a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant
Seat: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAMARB Rules
Role: Presiding Arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian company (Claimant) vs. State of Minas Gerais (Respondent)
Issue: Concession case for a soccer stadium
Seat: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAMARB Rules
Role: Presiding Arbitrator
Parties: Brazilian construction company (Claimant) vs. Brazilian state-owned company (Respondent)
Issue: Concession dispute
Seat: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law

CAMFIEP Rules
Role: Co-arbitrator
Parties: Portuguese company and Brazilian individual (Claimants) vs. Portuguese and Brazilian individuals (Respondents)
Issue: Corporate dispute
Seat: Curitiba, Brazil
Language: Portuguese
Applicable Law: Brazilian law